Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/28/1998 02:09 PM House JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSSB 242(FIN) - FORFEIT GOOD TIME OF SOME SEX OFFENDERS CHAIRMAN GREEN announced the first item of business would be CSSB 242(FIN), "An Act providing for the forfeiture of good time sentence credits of sex offenders who fail to successfully complete sex offender treatment programs." Number 0059 CRAIG JOHNSON, Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Jerry Ward, Alaska State Legislature, presented the bill on behalf of the sponsor, extending Senator Ward's apology for being unable to attend because of another committee meeting. Mr. Johnson explained that SB 242 calls for the forfeiture of good time credits for those who do not complete their court-ordered treatment programs for sexual offenses; those credits can be for up to one- third of a sentence for people who are "model citizens" during their prison terms. He said it is a simple bill that will cause people to take their training. Number 0130 REPRESENTATIVE BRIAN PORTER asked if there is any way a prisoner can try but fail. MR. JOHNSON said the Senate had reviewed this program as part of its outcome-based budgeting. They have asked the department to look more aggressively at how it measures success and monitors this, and they expect that in the future. However, attendance is the measuring stick now; if prisoners don't attend, they don't pass. Number 0226 REPRESENTATIVE CON BUNDE said successful completion would be difficult to judge as to whether any behavior had been modified. MR. JOHNSON agreed. He told members this began the previous year in the Senate, with the creation of a study of cultural relevance for inmates. One criticism of this bill is that it discriminates against Natives because the training is not necessarily geared to them. Mr. Johnson said this past week, the Department of Corrections had completed a training program for all of their people involved in these types of programs, and they are starting to address culturally relevant issues; that is the first step. The second step is that they found in their study that since 1997, there has been a zero recidivism rate for the 400 or so that have successfully completed this training. Mr. Johnson concluded, "So once we have the program addressing those that need it, the program works. The third part of that equation is, 'Now get people in the program.' And that is what this legislation does." Number 0342 REPRESENTATIVE ERIC CROFT expressed concern about someone who fails to complete a first program but completes a second. He pointed out that page 1, line 9, says fails to successfully complete a program. MR. JOHNSON replied that passing or failing is pretty much at the discretion of the commissioner. At this point, attending a program is success. Therefore, if a prisoner was ordered to take a program and took three programs but only graduated from one, the commissioner could deem that as success. He said ultimately, the success of this type of program is whether a prisoner is back in jail; a prisoner must be released before success can be determined. Number 0544 REPRESENTATIVE CROFT said it seems that part of the difficulty is it is phrased in the negative, but he isn't sure yet which way it should read. Number 0596 REPRESENTATIVE NORMAN ROKEBERG inquired about the current status of the sex offender rehabilitation program, given the conversion of Hiland Mountain Correctional Center to a women's facility. He said that is where the primary sex offender program was in place. He asked what the Department of Corrections is doing about that. MR. JOHNSON replied that there are programs in several of the institutions now, including Lemon Creek Correctional Center and the Palmer Correctional Center. He said they are looking at expanding those facilities to house the treatment programs. Number 0650 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG said the inability of the department to provide the programs should not be an impediment to this. MR. JOHNSON replied, "And it isn't." He referred committee members to lines 11 and 12, which read, "by the commissioner and the program has been made available to the prisoner by the department." He said this bill would not affect a model prisoner in a situation where a program was not available. Number 0692 REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE said he reads "a program" to mean simply a program, not a specific program in a series of offerings, and if a person used bits and pieces but completed what is considered a sex offender program, that would suffice. CHAIRMAN GREEN concurred with that reading. Number 0730 REPRESENTATIVE JEANNETTE JAMES said it seems to be defined by the one program that the person is ordered to participate in, and there is already a definition somewhere that says what the prisoners are supposed to do. She said she feels comfortable with it, noting the testimony that just attending means successful completion. Number 0774 JAYNE ANDREEN, Executive Director, Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, Department of Public Safety, came forward and stated support for SB 242. She told members, "As people know, Alaska has one of the highest rates of sexual assault in the nation, and sex offenders are one of the toughest groups of offenders to rehabilitate. We know that we can't cure sex offenders. At the very best - very best - they can be ... taught to control their violent impulses. We think that this bill adds to the tools that the Department of Corrections, as well as the state of Alaska, has in holding offenders accountable for meeting the requirements of their sentence, and we fully support it." Number 0800 REPRESENTATIVE ETHAN BERKOWITZ asked whether there is enough program space to accommodate all the offenders currently. MS. ANDREEN said she doesn't know, but she knows that the Department of Corrections has a couple of programs available in the facilities. In the past, there has been a waiting list; she said she would defer to the department to address that. Number 0843 REPRESENTATIVE CROFT referred to AS 33.16.220, revocation of parole, and noted that the board may revoke parole if the person has violated an order to participate in or comply with the treatment plan. He said there is a "may" for everybody else, but it is mandatory for sex offenders. That may make sense, but it is not really adding a new tool so much as making it mandatory for a specific crime where there is a high recidivism rate and a tough rehabilitation task. He asked whether that is accurate. Number 0889 MS. ANDREEN said that would also have to be deferred to the Department of Corrections. She added, "My understanding is that if the court orders that an offender complete a program, that the Department of Corrections does withhold their good time if they do not complete that program. My understanding is ... they have less clear guidelines around it if someone's just been ordered to participate." Number 0939 LAUREE HUGONIN, Director, Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, came forward to testify, stating that the network supports the bill. She said their concerns about spacing and how it was worded had been resolved. She agreed that sex offenders are not the easiest to rehabilitate, and she expressed support for whatever mechanisms can be put in place to keep them from reoffending. Number 0984 REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ asked whether Ms. Hugonin knows if there is enough program space to accommodate all the prisoners. MS. HUGONIN said she didn't know. Number 1042 REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE made a motion to move CSSB 242(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and with the attached fiscal note(s). CHAIRMAN GREEN asked whether there was any objection. Hearing none, he announced that CSSB 242(FIN) was moved from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|